Epub ñ Contempt of Court The Turn of the Century Lynching That Launched a Hundred Years of Federalism ó Mark Curriden
Whirlwind of groundbreaking legal action whose import Thurgood Marshall would claim has never been fully explained Provocative thorough and gripping Contempt of Court is a long overdue look at events that clearly depict the peculiar and tenuous relationship between justice and the law Every lawyer should read this book if not every person on the planet Contempt of Court takes us back in time to 1906 when juries were composed solely of white men lynchings were carried out with the complicit approval of law enforcement and when the accused had few due process protections And it tells the story of black heroes which history has forgotten view spoilerEd Johnson a black man was accused of raping a white woman Although dozens of alibi witnesses testify to his actual innocence Johnson's guilt was already established by the color of his skin The same day Johnson was arrested the newspapers rallied the angry white men into a frenzy and a lynching was attempted that very night Since that moment the Sheriff Judge and Prosecutor conspired to hang Johnson before the lynch mob could do it They were nearly successful until two black members of the bar initiated Johnson's appeal hide spoiler
Mark Curriden ó Contempt of Court The Turn of the Century Lynching That Launched a Hundred Years of Federalism Text
Contempt of Court The Turn of the Century Lynching That Launched a Hundred Years of FederalismTo die in Chattanooga Tennessee Two black lawyers not even part of the original defense appealed to the Supreme Court for a stay of execution and the stay incredibly was granted Frenzied with rage at the deision locals responded by lynching Johnson and what ensued was a breathtaking The book revisits the genesis of 20th century federal court oversight of state court criminal trials particularly in the context of the epidemic of racially motivated lynchings in the southern US between 1870 and 1906 The text clearly lays out the details of the injustice visited upon one Ed Johnson an innocent African American man from Chattanooga TN who was falsely accused of raping a white woman The authors describe his railroading through the Tennessee state court system the all white jury system in that state during the early 1900s the racial bias of newspapers prosecutors the trial judge and law enforcement officials and Johnson's ultimate murder by a white mob aided and abetted by local law enforcement officials shortly after the US Supreme Court agreed to consider an appeal from a lower federal court's denial of his habeas corpus petition Amazingly after than 30 years of diluting or ignoring rights guaranteed against states pursuant to the post civil war Fourteenth Amendment the US Supreme Court in a novel contempt proceeding against a county sheriff exercised its authority to enforce its own mandates against state and local officialsI hesitate to give the book than 3 stars however in light of several factual errors I came across in the book eg Theodore Roosevelt did not graduate from or even attend Harvard Law School and it would thus have been impossible for him to have appointed attorney Edward Terry Sanford to the federal bench because they were classmates there Roosevelt graduated from Harvard College and later attended Columbia Law School for a short time but dropped out of law school to run for the New York State Assembly; Miranda v Arizona which articulated the Constitutional rights afforded to those accused of crimes while in police custody was decided in 1966 not 1963 and the freuent melodramatic and over exaggerated conclusions reached by the authorsNonetheless the book revisits an important and all too freuently forgotten era in US racial and judicial history