Download Doc ✓ L'être et le néant 688 pages

Jean-Paul Sartre õ L'être et le néant Doc

Download Doc ✓ L'être et le néant 688 pages ¾ Being Nothingness is without doubt one of the most significant philosophical books of the 20th century The central work by one of the century's most influential thinkers it altered the course of western philosophy Its revolutionary approach challenged all previous assumptions about Being Nothingness is without doubt one of the most significant philosophical books of the 20th century The central work by one of the century's most influential thinkers it One of the cold serious works I've read this treatise exerts a strange power that forces readers onward despite the dense subject matter and clunky English translationThe subject is man's experience of reality Here you have a rigorous scouring of the subject resulting in a proof of human freedom so thorough you'll never fool with hard determinism again Every aspect of consciousness is traced in all its implications After reading this there seems little to be said about the basis in reality of human thought The uniue effect of reading the book for me came from exploring my own mind and thoughts for insight as I followed what Sartre said The scope of the book treats conscious thought in isolation You need a fairly good philosophical vocabulary to read it as well as a highlighter Even then some of the points are so abstruse you have to pause and think often on each paragraph Joseph Catalano's A Commentary on Jean Paul Sartre's Being and Nothingness is a valuable companion Those considering reading this book may want to read Catalano alongside it As with many existential works this study tends to ignore external influences on thought Sartre does pose the problem of the situation limit to human freedom but without exploring it in any detail As a result the outward natural necessity that provides the context for human freedom receives scant attention Thence comes the sense of a human consciousness unbounded in its freedom Sartre's characterization of the human mind possessing absolute freedom and absolute responsibility takes on a metaphysical aura; this as much as anything accounts for the book's ability to engage one's feelings The reading of this work is actually rewarding than what one might learn from it What an intriguing effect for such an academic work

Epub ´ L'être et le néant õ Jean-Paul Sartre

Altered the course of western philosophy Its revolutionary approach challenged all previous assumptions about the individual's relationship with the world Known as 'the Bibl A few years ago I read about half of Being and Nothingness finally Back in school days I thought I was cutting my philosophical teeth on Sartre and the others known as existentialists I’m uite certain I was making most of it up It was time to play catch up and read Sartre’s work which I believed to have already assimilated It evolves that I had moved uite a distance beyond Sartre’s “existentialism” But I did not finish my reading for external reasons and it remains on my shelf for that eventual returnBut mostly I’m posting this note in order to remove a chip from my shoulder My claim here is that Sartre is the only existentialist; and his existentialism is merely a portion of his work; and that it is the least important of his work What I mean is that Sartre was a phenomenologist His contribution to twentieth century philosophy was not the development of “the philosophy of existentialism” but rather his continuance of and contributions to the phenomenological researches begun by Husserl carried further by Heidegger contributions by Merleau Ponty Gadamer Ricoeur ETC Sartre is perhaps the lesser philosopher But as intellectual he was indubitably a giant on the French landscape But see my claim is that he was “intellectual” than “philosopher” And his existentialism had to do with his status as intellectual than as philosopher; don’t hold too tight to that distinctionBut let it be said Sartre is perhaps the noblest figure of the twentieth century in regard to the uestion of atheism in so far as he was the only thinker to that time who fully realized the conseuences brought on by the deathdisappearance of a transcendental guarantee freuently known as “God”; existentialism was perhaps nothing than a response to this uestionLet it be further said that I don’t have too much to say about the literary grouping known as “existentialist” for writing such Sartre was also rather well known along with de Beauvoir Sarraute and someone named Camus I uit reading these things about the time I began to understand philosophySo then as to Sartre being the only existentialist Here’s what I think happened and which has caused than two centuries of the history of philosophy to be misunderstood by the popular mind A popularizer of philosophy or a few but mostly Walter Kaufman read Sartre His reading of Sartre allowed him to see similar themes and issues and orientations in philosophers from earlier eras; but without having read Sartre he would not have seen these things in other thinkers This is a case similar to Kafka’s writing causing us to retrospectively find kafka esue elements in writers who preceded Kafka although we had never seen those things before or taken them as kafka esue; and we find a whole series of kafka ism preceding the thing itself With a popular book or two; overnight we suddenly had an entire history of existentialist thinkers Heidegger became one so did Nietzsche and Kierkegaard even back to Shakespeare and Pascal Reading Sartre certainly causes us to read these thinkers in a new light but to assimilate them to something like “existentialism” is simply uninformative at best misleading at worst Depend upon it anyone calling Heidegger an existentialist does not know the first thing they are learning patience about twentieth century philosophy Anyone who believes that Kierkegaard or Nietzsche were existentialists and they absolutely were not and never could be “postmodernists” they were Hegelians as is Sartre in his better moments This is really the only thing I want to say Sartre is the only existentialist Existentialism is and never was a very important part of twentieth century philosophy What was important and still is is phenomenology Forget the existentialist reading of the history of philosophy It causes confusion than understanding

Mobi L'être et le néant

L'être et le néantE of existentialism' its impact on culture literature was immediate was felt worldwide from the absurdist drama of Samuel Beckett to the soul searching cries of the Beat poe Well really Being and Nothingness is a literary tract disguised as philosophy The many metaphors he uses to illustrate his points are not philosophical in nature but imagistic and suggestive There is a certain wholeness to the book but it reminds me of Ulysses than Heidegger The one real philosophical idea is that of Bad Faith which is just his super super ego working overtime Although an important landmark for 20th century literature it is an unpleasant book to read and the pain is not worth the insular faux insights He tries to create a philosophical no exit but it really is of an imagistic cul de sac